THERMAL SCIENCE

International Scientific Journal

Saša R PavlovićORCID

,

Reyhaneh Loni

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLAR VACUUM CONICAL AND SPIRAL CAVITY RECEIVERS: DRIVING SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GOVERNANCE

ABSTRACT
This study investigates the performance of a solar dish concentrator system equipped with vacuum conical and spiral cavity receivers, utilizing thermal oil as the working fluid. It specifically evaluates and compares the efficiency of vacuum and non-vacuum conical cavity receivers. The analysis is grounded in energy, exergy and environmental (3E) evaluation frameworks. These theoretical approaches assess the system's thermodynamic efficiency (energy/exergy) and its environmental impact mitigation potential. The methodology involves a comparative analysis of vacuum and non-vacuum conical cavity receivers, as well as vacuum spiral receivers, to determine their effects on the solar dish collector's efficiency. Thermal oil serves as the working fluid, and performance metrics (energy/exergy efficiency, overall system efficiency) are evaluated under real world conditions (e.g., seasonal variations, such as June and November 2021). The vacuum conical cavity receiver demonstrated superior performance, achieving energy and exergy efficiencies of approximately 73.45% and 17%, respectively, in June 2021. The highest improvements in energy (2.05%), exergy (2.17%), and overall efficiency (2.09%) were observed in November 2021 with the application of vacuum conical cavity receiver were compared to the non-vacuum one. The study underscores the role of vacuum receivers in enhancing solar system performance and provides policy recommendations to advance energy governance and sustainable energy practices through innovative solar technologies. These findings contribute to optimizing solar-efficient systems for sustainable development.
KEYWORDS
Vacuum cavity receiver, Comparison Study, Spiral and Conical cavity receivers, Energy governance, sustainability, Policy recommendations
PAPER SUBMITTED: 2026-05-16
PAPER REVISED: 2026-07-02
PAPER ACCEPTED: 2026-07-05
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2026-08-08
DOI REFERENCE: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI260516161P
REFERENCES (26)
[1] J. Caputo, Sustainable forest biomass: promoting renewable energy and forest stewardship, Citeseer2009
[2] K. Shahverdi, G. Najafi, R. Mamat, M.F. Ghazali, A. Ei-Shafy, M. Mousa, Introducing a design procedure for Archimedes Screw Turbine based on optimization algorithm, Energy for Sustainable Development, 72 (2023) 162-172
[3] M.M. Shirbani, S.E. Alavi, Multi-objective optimization and performance analysis of bimorph magneto-electro-elastic energy harvesters, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 23 (2025) 667-686
[4] K. Kaygusuz, Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions for sustainable development in Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (2009) 253-270
[5] C. Bhowmik, D. Zindani, P. Chatterjee, D. Marinkovic, J. Šliogerienė, Evaluation of green energy sources: an extended fuzzy-todim approach based on schweizer-sklar and power averaging operators, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 23 (2025) 627-648
[6] J. Zou, K.T. Ooi, Z. Kang, H. Jin, J. Li, Performance optimization of a dual-synchronous adjustable ejector for hydrogen recirculation in high-power fuel cell under variable load conditions, Energy, (2026) 140495
[7] M.J.B. Kabeyi, O.A. Olanrewaju, Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply, Frontiers in Energy research, 9 (2022) 743114
[8] A.H. Arkian, G. Najafi, S. Gorjian, R. Loni, E. Bellos, T. Yusaf, Performance assessment of a solar dryer system using small parabolic dish and alumina/oil nanofluid: Simulation and experimental study, Energies, 12 (2019) 4747
[9] P. Kiriakidis, T. Christoudias, J. Kushta, J. Lelieveld, Projected wind and solar energy potential in the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East in 2050, Science of the Total Environment, 927 (2024) 172120
[10] R. Loni, A. Kasaeian, O. Mahian, A.Z. Sahin, S. Wongwises, Exergy analysis of a solar organic Rankine cycle with square prismatic cavity receiver, International Journal of Exergy, 22 (2017) 103-124
[11] R. Loni, A. Kasaeian, E.A. Asli-Ardeh, B. Ghobadian, Optimizing the efficiency of a solar receiver with tubular cylindrical cavity for a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle, Energy, 112 (2016) 1259-1272
[12] A. Rafiei, R. Loni, M.H. Ahmadi, G. Najafi, E. Bellos, F. Rajaee, E. Askari Asli-Ardeh, Sensitivity analysis of a parabolic trough concentrator with linear V-shape cavity, Energy Science & Engineering, 8 (2020) 3544-3560
[13] R. Loni, A. Kasaeian, E.A. Asli-Ardeh, B. Ghobadian, W. Le Roux, Performance study of a solar-assisted organic Rankine cycle using a dish-mounted rectangular-cavity tubular solar receiver, Applied Thermal Engineering, 108 (2016) 1298-1309
[14] R. Loni, E.A. Asli-Ardeh, B. Ghobadian, A. Kasaeian, S. Gorjian, Numerical and experimental investigation of wind effect on a hemispherical cavity receiver, Applied Thermal Engineering, 126 (2017) 179-193
[15] R. Loni, E.A. Asli-Areh, B. Ghobadian, A. Kasaeian, S. Gorjian, G. Najafi, E. Bellos, Research and review study of solar dish concentrators with different nanofluids and different shapes of cavity receiver: Experimental tests, Renewable Energy, 145 (2020) 783-804
[16] S. Pavlovic, R. Loni, E. Bellos, D. Vasiljević, G. Najafi, A. Kasaeian, Comparative study of spiral and conical cavity receivers for a solar dish collector, Energy Conversion and Management, 178 (2018) 111-122
[17] R. Loni, E.A. Asli-Ardeh, B. Ghobadian, A. Kasaeian, Experimental study of carbon nano tube/oil nanofluid in dish concentrator using a cylindrical cavity receiver: outdoor tests, Energy conversion and management, 165 (2018) 593-601
[18] R. Loni, S. Pavlovic, E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, E.A. Asli-Ardeh, Thermal and exergy performance of a nanofluid-based solar dish collector with spiral cavity receiver, Applied Thermal Engineering, 135 (2018) 206-217
[19] R. Loni, E.A. Asli-Ardeh, B. Ghobadian, A. Kasaeian, E. Bellos, Thermal performance comparison between Al2O3/oil and SiO2/oil nanofluids in cylindrical cavity receiver based on experimental study, Renewable energy, 129 (2018) 652-665
[20] A.A. Abed, M.R. Elmarghany, A.M. Hamed, W.M. El-Awady, Investigating the performance of an affordable parabolic dish collector with double glass vacuum cavity cover, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 278 (2024) 113174
[21] Y. Fang, S. Memon, J. Peng, M. Tyrer, T. Ming, Solar thermal performance of two innovative configurations of air-vacuum layered triple glazed windows, Renewable Energy, 150 (2020) 167-175
[22] B. Kalidasan, M.A. Hassan, A. Pandey, S. Chinnasamy, Linear cavity solar receivers: A review, Applied Thermal Engineering, 221 (2023) 119815
[23] Y.A. Cengel, A.J. Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer (in SI Units), Mcgraw-Hill Education-Europe, London, 2014
[24] Y.A. Cengel, R.H. Turner, J.M. Cimbala, M. Kanoglu, Fundamentals of thermal-fluid sciences, McGraw-Hill New York2001
[25] L. Sahota, G. Tiwari, Exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic analyses of hybrid double slope solar still loaded with nanofluids, Energy Conversion and Management, 148 (2017) 413-430
[26] A.M. Moghani, R. Loni, Review on energy governance and demand security in oil-rich countries, Energy Strategy Reviews, 57 (2025) 101625
PDF VERSION [DOWNLOAD]
Comparative analysis of solar vacuum conical and spiral cavity receivers: driving sustainable energy governance

© 2026 Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia. Published by the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence